Friday, April 8, 2011

Engine vs. Steel

Engines are a better invention than steel. Reason one is you can go far with cars that takes an engine but, not far with steel. In fact you can't get anywhere with steel. Also, most things you use for transportation are moving because of the engine. Last reason is that steel takes a lot to make you have to dig underground to get the steel and melt it. A good thing about steel is that some engines are made of steel, but all engines are not made of steel.


-Chauntel

The engine is better than steel. It is better because it helps you to keep your car running so you can get to where you need to go. Also because some engines are not made out of steel, where some engines are made out of steel. Last but not least it is better because most vehicles use engines which shows that a engine is a more popular invention than steel. But even though the car is made out of steel you need to have a engine to get the car running and moving.  

-Johnathan


Steel is better than the engine and I’m going to tell you why. An engine is useless without a car. And the cars are made of steel. And a lot more industrial things are made out of steel to make buildings. Yes an engine is for your car. But without steel you couldn’t have an engine because the engine is made out of steel and metal. I rest my case steel is more important than metal.


-Nia




I strongly believe  that  steel is better. One reason why is because an engine is made out of steel. If the steel wasn’t in the engine, it wouldn’t be an engine. You need steel to make it. You wouldn’t have an engine without steel. Also another reason is because you put it in a lot of things. Steel is in chairs, legs of tables, stoves, washers, driers, and more. You do use a engines for a lot of things, like in a car and a boat. But an engine is still made with steel. In conclusion, steel is way better!!!!!
By Shauntia


Steel is better than The Engine. Steel will build the strongest house you've ever seen. Steel will protect you from an Earthquake if you go to a Main steel Shelter. If you wear steel armor, you're sure to be protected. Sure the Engine powers your car. But steel is what is on top of your car. If there was no steel on your car, you'd be driving around in a car, unprotected and probably get a Disease when you drive around in winter. Most engines are made of steel. Steel will protect you. The engine will Power your car.

-Channon



I think steel is better  than an engine. Steel is good because it makes the engine. Steel makes the engine and if there was no steel there would be no engine. Since  the steel was created you’re lucky because you need an engine for your car. You can make a lot of stuff with steel. However the steel is better because it makes the engine.

BY SUHMER

Light Bulb vs. Shoes

A LIGHT BULB IS BETTER THAN SHOES. You need a light bulb to see in the dark at night to go to the bathroom. You need a light bulb in your house because you can die without one if you don't now where every thing is. When your power is out you can use a battery and a small or a big light bulb to have some light in your house. You can not wear light bulbs as shoes because they are going to brake easily when you first put them on your feet. But a light bulb is still better because it is a life saver and shoes that you will soon out grow will then be a waste because they don't have light.


-Jessica 




A LIGHT BULB IS BETTER THAN SHOES.
IF you where to stay in your house for the rest of your life the shoes would be use-less and since you paid that money for shoes you cant afford a light bulb. light bulb is also better because if you had no lights then what would you do dont think to grab your keys because you cant find them. lastly, NO LIGHTS ! that could cause a fire then those shoes will be long gone. IT is true that shoes are style and hurt your feet less. BUT! in my opinion i would rather have corns on my toes than hit a wall every night in my house with no lights (pitch black) p.s. get a light bulb =~) 


-Rashidah

Shoes are better than lightbulb because without shoes you can get a dangerous disease. Also if you don't have any shoes you can't play sports because you can get glass in your foot, or rocks slice your foot. And your shoes can't run out of energy like a lightbulb. It is true that lightbulb can light up your room, but you can go to sleep at night and wake up and the day where it's light. That's four reasons why shoes better than a lightbulb.  


-DaQuawn


Reason 1:shoes are better because if you didn't your feet would be cold.  Reason 2: shoes are better because they can make you money.  Reason 3: shoes are better because if you didn't have them your feet would get a disese in your foot.  Concession: a light helps you see. Rebuttal: but light bulbs raise your energy bill, and that's why shoes are better.


-Brandon



SHOES ARE BETTER THAN LIGHT BULBS, AND I WOULD RATHER HAVE SHOES THAN A LIGHT BULB. I LIKE SHOES BETTER BECAUSE IF YOU DIDN'T HAVE SHOES YOU WOULD JUST BE WALKING AROUND BAREFOOT. YOU DON'T NEED LIGHT BULBS ANYWAY, YOU CAN BUY ONE CANDLE FOR 1$ AT THE STORE. PLUS IF YOU DIDN'T HAVE ANY SHOES YOU COULDN'T GO AND GET A LIGHT BULB. A LIGHT BULB IS GOOD BECAUSE YOU CAN'T JUST WALK AROUND IN THE DARK ALL NIGHT. BUT YOU  DON'T NEED A LIGHT BULB BECAUSE YOU CAN USE A CANDLE. THAT'S WHY SHOES ARE BETTER THAN LIGHT BULBS.  

 -Chris

I think that shoes are better than a light bulb. I think this because you need shoes to walk around. you might step in some glass and your foot start gushing out blood. Another reason I think this because There are different types of shoes--like jordan’s, air force ones, gym shoes, casual shoes, and shoes with straps, high heels, etc. I also think this because there are many stores to shop at for shoes. Its true that you need a light bulb to see the shoes. But its correct you need shoes to protect your feet. In conclusion shoes are better than a light bulb.

By Jenna

Democracy vs. Ice Cube

Democracy is better than Ice Cubes because the right to vote is good. If you don't vote you would not feel safe. You can lose money because there might be a bad president. You can use Ice Cubes to make your water cold but Ice Cubes can't give you money, houses and many other things. The right to vote is good. Go Democracy! 

-Glenn

Democracy will beat ice cube because everybody needs to have the right to vote. Would you want one person voting or do you want to vote?  That's why you need to vote.  You need rights democracy can't give you a cold drink, but it can give you the right to vote.  That's what I am trying to say. Go democracy. If you vote for me, that means you want the right to vote.

-John


Democracy is better than an Ice Cube. One reason is because in democracy you get to vote. Another reason democracy is better than an ice cube is because you get to have a good government that makes laws that are fair. In addition, in democracy everyone has freedom and equal rights. An ice cube doesn’t have a right over anything. An ice cube can cool a hot drink down when you put ice in it. However, democracy makes it so everyone and everything is fair As you can see democracy is better than an ice cube.

By Keturah



We need democracy. We need democracy because if we don't have democracy you will not have a good President or Mayor. In Addition if you don't have democracy we will not be in a good city or Country. Also we need democracy to have are Country and City peace. Finally I think we need democracy or you can go with Ice Cube that will melt. next it will not take long to melt. Also an Ice Cube can make stuff cold. But compared to democracy it will lose. I think democracy will win not Ice Cube.    

By Romance


Ice cubes should win.
Reason 1: if you get to hot you can get a water bottle and put ice cubes in it.
Reason 2: ice cube can cool you down in the season of spring and summer.
Reason 3: ice cube can make things stay cool even it can make you stay cool all day.
Concession: democracy would win because democracy is a better definition .
Rebuttal: ice cubes cool you down not democracy.
Conclusion: if I get to hot I can use a ice cube in my water bottle. 

-Soleil


The winner between Democracy and ice cube is ice cube.  A ice cube is better than democracy. The first reason why I chose the ice cube is because a ice cube can turn into H2O and H2O helps you stay alive. Another reason why I picked the ice cube is because ice cubes it keeps you hydrated. The last reason why I chose the ice cube is because ice cubes keep things cold for when your hot on a summer hot day. Although democracy gives you the chose to vote. But ice cubes are better because water is apart of life and you. In conclusion the ice cube is better than democracy. By: Kaylen

Bike vs. Poetry

A Bike is better than poetry because you can get exercise, you can have fun and you can look sweet with it.It is true that poetry has strong feelings. But a bike is better because your design can also show your strong feelings.

-Zae'Shawn



Bike is going to win. One reason I think bike is going to win is because
you need it to go places. Places you can go on your bike are the store , friends' houses , or restaurants. Next, bikes are helpful because if
your car is broken and you have no money for cab, taxi, bus, or ride from a friend you can ride your bike. Last but not least, a bike is great because you do not always have †o drive your kids to school. They can ride their bike to school. It’s true that poetry is great when your mad it CALMs you down. But I think that a bike is better. In Conclusion a bike is better.
P.S Trick Bikes Are Cool!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
By Armani

Bike is better than poetry because when you have poetry you intend to sit in a chair and you're bored reading lots of words that you don't know what they mean half of the time. When you could be outside on a beautiful day flying through the warm air on a bike that's your favorite color!!!!! Reason 2: Poetry can't deliver morning newspapers if that's a kids morning job!.......a bike can!!!!!!!!!!! Reason 3: Poetry is soooooo not transportation! A bike is like the number one transportation for kids! Poetry can be funny and tongue twisting sometimes like the time I read pickety fence by: David McCord in the third grade. But poetry can't take you to a store,....... A BIKE CAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

-Kathrynne


I think a bike is better than poetry. You can ride a bike but you can’t ride poetry. Also a bike
can be any color but poetry isn’t a color. In addition, a bike has wheels but poetry doesn’t.
You can read poetry but you can’t read a bike. A bike is better than poetry because
you can ride it.I love to ride my bike with my friends. In conclusion, I think a bike is better than poetry.

By Alexandria.



POETRY IS BETTER THAN A BIKE. POETRY IS SMOOTH MUSIC. IT'S JUST LIKE JAZZ MUSIC, BUT THE PEOPLE WRITE WITH A SMOOTH VOICE. POETRY IS NICE TO LISTEN TO. BIKES ARE NICE TO RIDE. BUT POETRY IS BETTER THAN BIKE BECAUSE POETRY IS NICE AND SMOOTH.

-Torrez


I believe that poetry is better than bike. I believe that poetry is better because when you write poetry you can express your feelings. Also when you read poetry it can make you happy. Another thing is that poetry can help you fell better. Also poetry is beautiful. It is true that a bike is fun to ride on though. But as you can see poetry is fun to read and write.

By Selena



I think poetry is better than a bike because you can't express your self with a bike ,and bikes are very dangerous. Also poetry is good for your education.  True, if you can't drive than you can ride a bike, but you do not need a bike. You can walk while reading and writing poetry because poetry expresses your self. Its better to write poetry than to think about committing suicide while on a bike and get hit by a car =).

-Imanye



Poetry is way better than a bike. First, you can write while your doing it. Another one is, you can use thoughtful words. Also, it’s lots of types of poems you can write. You can ride a bike to a place. But you can’t write nice words of poetry on a bike. In conclusion, I love to write poetry which is way better than a bike.

By Chase

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Tooth Paste vs. Shoes

I think toothpaste is better than shoes because toothpaste helps prevent gingivitis .It also prevent cavities and other mouth infections .Last but not least it prevents stains among the plaque line.

Other pick:
Shoes can prevent getting cuts on your foot .
But , shoes also can get busted up quick when you play or wear them too much.

Conclusion:
I think toothpaste is better than shoes because you don't need shoes you need toothpaste.


-Chauntel


Shoes are better than toothpaste because,reason one: you don't need to have toothpaste togo to the store. Reason two: when you go to your best friend's wedding you don't need toothpaste on your feet
because it will just make the sittuation worse! Shoes are just plain stylish! tootpaste sooooooooo not!!!!!!!!! Toothpaste can brush your teeth and make your mouth smell good and get rid of some germs. But toothpaste can't cover someones stinky feet, if someone did use toothpaste it would just make the sittuation worse. So this is my arguement. "SHOES VS. TOOTHPASTE"

-KATHRYNNE






I believe shoes is better than a tube of toothpaste.First of all shoes keep you warm.Second of all shoes look cute on your feet instead of just your feet.Third of all shoes come in many sizes and shapes.It is true toothpaste keep your breath fresh but not shoes.Shoes can make your dressy clothes look even more dressy like heels or flats but not toothpaste.In conclusion shoes is a better invention than a tube of toothpaste.

--Danielle